The register/MC/26/0194

Land off Higham Road, beside Eternal Lake Nature Reserve

Higham Road, Cliffe. Refused on 26 August 2026.

The register entry

Land off Higham Road, beside Eternal Lake Nature Reserve, Higham Road, Cliffe

Refused
Homes up to 100Developer Gleeson Land

Outline application for up to 100 dwellings on a 5.18 hectare site south of Higham Road and east of Buckland Road, immediately beside the Eternal Lake Nature Reserve, with access from Higham Road. Received 5 February 2026. The officer report recorded 139 letters of objection, together with objections from Cliffe and Cliffe Woods Parish Council, residents, councillors and other organisations — including the RSPB, which objected over recreational and urbanisation impacts on the surrounding designated sites. Natural England did not take a position: it told Medway it was not able to give specific advice on the application and referred the council to its standing advice. Kent Wildlife Trust did not comment. REFUSED by Medway’s Planning Committee on 26 August 2026, in line with the officer recommendation as amended. The published officer report recommended refusal for five reasons; a sixth, on the Special Protection Areas, was added by the Supplementary Agenda Advice Sheet on the day, which also rewrote the other five to match the National Planning Policy Framework published on 17 August 2026. Officers accepted that Medway cannot demonstrate a five-year housing land supply — the developer’s central argument — and that the tilted balance applies and recommended refusal regardless. Medway issued the decision notice on 7 September 2026, giving the six reasons as amended on the day. The six-month period for an appeal to the Planning Inspectorate runs from that date.

Refused for 6 reasons
  1. Conflict with the development plan, on an unallocated greenfield site outside the settlement boundary
  2. Harm to existing residents and to the rural character of Higham Road
  3. Unacceptable landscape and visual harm, urbanising the edge of Cliffe
  4. Permanent loss of 5.18 hectares of Grade 3a best and most versatile agricultural land
  5. No completed agreement securing affordable housing or infrastructure contributions
  6. Failure to address effects on the Thames Estuary and Marshes and Medway Estuary and Marshes Special Protection Areas, including appropriate assessment and mitigation
  • Land right beside the Eternal Lake Nature Reserve
  • Best and most versatile agricultural land
  • A new access onto Higham Road
What was argued (opens in a new tab)Checked 2026-10-09

Noticeboard

What the group has said about it

Newest first. The full noticeboard is on the main page.

Higham Road: the refusal notice is out

Medway issued the decision notice refusing MC/26/0194 on 7 September 2026. It gives the six reasons agreed at committee, as amended on the day and says an appeal must be made within six months of the date of the notice. The draft minutes of the 26 August meeting are now published as well. They record the refusal and its reasons but not how the vote went, so the unanimity reported by members present remains the group’s own account rather than the official record.

Read the source: Higham Road: the refusal notice is out (opens in a new tab)

Higham Road: still no decision notice

Nine days after the committee refused MC/26/0194, Medway’s own file still shows no decision made date and no decision printed date, checked on 4 September 2026. The six-month period in which Gleeson Land can appeal runs from the date on the decision notice, not from the vote, so it has not begun. The minutes of the meeting of 26 August have not been published either, so the account of the vote on this page remains our own rather than the official record.

Read the source: Higham Road: still no decision notice (opens in a new tab)

Higham Road refused

Medway’s Planning Committee refused MC/26/0194, Gleeson Land’s application for up to 100 houses on farmland off Higham Road, on the evening of 26 August, following the officer recommendation to refuse as amended on the day. Six reasons were given — among them the permanent loss of 5.18 hectares of Grade 3a best and most versatile agricultural land and a failure to address the effects on the Thames Estuary and Marshes and Medway Estuary and Marshes Special Protection Areas. That sixth reason was not in the published report: it was added by the Supplementary Agenda Advice Sheet on the day of the meeting. Members present report that the vote was unanimous. Medway had not published the minutes as at 27 August 2026, so that is our own account of the room rather than the official record. Councillor Elizabeth Turpin addressed the committee on behalf of herself and Councillor John Williams; Councillor Michael Pearce submitted 64 pages of representations. The officer report recorded 139 letters of objection. The applicant can still appeal.

Read the source: Higham Road refused (opens in a new tab)

Committee decides Higham Road on Wednesday

Superseded by the decision on 26 August. MC/26/0194, up to 100 homes beside the Eternal Lake Nature Reserve, is Item 5 at Medway’s Planning Committee on Wednesday 26 August, 6.30pm at St George’s Centre, Chatham Maritime. Officers recommend refusal: they accept Medway cannot show a five-year housing land supply, but conclude the harm to the rural character of the area is unacceptable. The meeting is open to the public and the report is published.

Read the source: Committee decides Higham Road on Wednesday (opens in a new tab)

How we got here

Where it sits in the story

  1. Higham Road refused

    Medway’s Planning Committee refuses MC/26/0194, up to 100 houses on farmland off Higham Road, following the officer recommendation as amended by the Supplementary Agenda Advice Sheet. Six reasons are given: five from the published report, rewritten to match the National Planning Policy Framework of 17 August 2026, plus a sixth added on the day on the Special Protection Areas. The decision notice followed on 7 September 2026.

  2. Higham Road: the refusal notice is issued

    Medway issues the decision notice refusing MC/26/0194, with the six reasons agreed at committee. The six months in which Gleeson Land can appeal to the Planning Inspectorate run from this date.